Check the latest ICC Women’s ODI Allrounders Rankings 2026 with live player ratings, ranking movement and the leading all-round performers in women’s one-day cricket.
Women’s ODI allrounders are valued for balance: players who can change a match with runs, wickets, catching and pressure overs across a 50-over innings. This page keeps the live ranking table at the centre and adds context around current ratings, recent leaders, career value and the kind of multi-skill performances that usually shape the top of the list.
| # | Team | Rating | Chg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Australia | 131 | - |
| 2 |  South Africa | 119 | - |
| 3 |  India | 104 | - |
| 4 |  England | 102 | - |
| 5 |  New Zealand | 102 | - |
| 6 |  Sri Lanka | 86 | - |
| 7 |  Bangladesh | 78 | - |
| 8 |  Pakistan | 75 | - |
| 9 |  West Indies | 68 | - |
| 10 |  Zimbabwe | 10 | - |
Rankings are not available at present for this selection.
ODI all-round play is different from both Test cricket and T20I cricket. A top women’s ODI allrounder may bat in the middle order, finish an innings, bowl a full quota or deliver key overs when the ball is old. Because of that, the ranking usually rewards players who remain involved for long stretches of a match rather than one-innings specialists.
In recent years, Ashleigh Gardner, Hayley Matthews, Marizanne Kapp, Nat Sciver-Brunt, Amelia Kerr and Deepti Sharma have all shown how valuable a genuine ODI allrounder can be. Some influence games with spin and late hitting, some with seam bowling and top-order runs, and some by controlling the middle overs in both innings. The live ratings above are therefore more than a simple form chart; they show which players are carrying two roles at international level.
An ODI allrounder rating reflects recent international performance across batting and bowling. A player can rise quickly after a strong series if she contributes in both disciplines, while a quiet run with either bat or ball can reduce her rating even if she remains a respected senior player.
The most valuable names near the top are usually those who offer captains flexibility. A top-order batter who can bowl ten overs gives a side balance; a frontline bowler who can score reliable lower-order runs gives depth. That is why allrounder rankings often include different player types: spinning allrounders, seam-bowling allrounders, batting allrounders and utility cricketers who fill several match roles.
ICC allrounder ratings combine a player’s batting and bowling impact in ODIs. The exact formula is designed so that one skill alone is not enough; a player must contribute meaningfully with both bat and ball to stay high in the allrounder list.
That makes the category different from the batting or bowling rankings. A batter can hold a high batting rating without bowling, and a bowler can dominate the bowling list without scoring many runs. An allrounder rating asks a broader question: who is producing value in both innings often enough to influence one-day matches?
ODI cricket also rewards durability. A 50-over game gives allrounders more time than T20I cricket to build an innings, recover from a slow start, bowl spells in different phases and create a second chance to affect the result. That is why many of the best ODI allrounders are players trusted in pressure situations across tournaments and bilateral series.
Across the last few seasons, women’s ODI allrounder discussions have often centred on Ashleigh Gardner, Hayley Matthews, Marizanne Kapp, Nat Sciver-Brunt, Amelia Kerr and Deepti Sharma. They represent different versions of the modern ODI allrounder: spin and power, seam and technique, top-order reliability, lower-order control and wicket-taking overs.
Gardner’s rise has been built on high-impact off-spin and aggressive lower-order batting. Matthews brings opening-batter value along with off-spin. Kapp has long combined new-ball quality with middle-order runs, while Sciver-Brunt has been one of the most complete batting allrounders in the format. Kerr and Deepti add spin control, batting depth and tournament value, making them regular names in the conversation when the best ODI allrounders of a recent calendar year are discussed.
It is difficult to name one confirmed year-end No.1 for every recent year without using an archived week-by-week ICC list. For the page, keep the claim evergreen: the recent era has been shaped by a small group of multi-skill players rather than a single permanent leader.
The No.1 position is shown in the live table on this page. As of the current uploaded rankings data, Ashleigh Gardner leads the women’s ODI allrounder list with the highest rating.
Allrounder ratings combine batting and bowling value in ODIs. A player needs meaningful contribution in both skills to stay high in the allrounder list.
A player can gain rating value after making runs, taking wickets or delivering a strong two-skill series. A quiet run with bat or ball can also affect the rating.
No. Batting rankings measure batting output, bowling rankings measure bowling output, and allrounder rankings reward players who contribute in both departments.
Ashleigh Gardner, Hayley Matthews, Marizanne Kapp, Nat Sciver-Brunt, Amelia Kerr and Deepti Sharma have been among the major multi-skill names in recent women’s ODI cricket.
Long continuous No.1 records require archived ICC ranking history. Without a complete archived list, it is better not to claim one confirmed longest holder.
The run+ and wickets+ notes are used as evergreen career-value indicators. They show that allrounder value comes from both scoring and wicket-taking rather than from one number alone.
Yes. ODI World Cup matches are official ODIs, so performances with bat and ball can influence a player’s rating when the rankings are updated.
Women ODI Team Rankings | Women ODI Allrounders Rankings | Women ODI Bowler Rankings